Today's post, another tedious retread (how many times have we had this one?) of the argument from contingency:
Friday, 19 September 2014
Wednesday, 17 September 2014
Today's post, which could have been better titled “Misunderstanding Occam's Razor for Fun and Profit”:
Hint: declaring something to be simple does not make it so.
Monday, 15 September 2014
Today's post, in which Longenecker defends his position in the previous post:
His defense is of course hopeless, but I suppose he at least gets credit for trying.
Friday, 12 September 2014
Wednesday, 10 September 2014
Monday, 8 September 2014
Friday, 5 September 2014
Wednesday, 3 September 2014
Historicity day! Today's article responds to Valerie Tarico's recent article, which is kind of odd because Tarico is a psychologist, not a historian, and if you want to argue honestly for historicity you should be arguing against the best case (currently Carrier's book), no?
(Also, using Ehrman's pathetic and overcooked response as your counter-argument is lame.)
Monday, 1 September 2014
Sunday, 31 August 2014
In the "everything requires a cause" thread especially, and also to some extent in other threads, there have been some rather egregious comments (many from Flynn, but he's far from the only offender) indicating complete ignorance of particle physics or nuclear physics. This post is for pointing them out in the comments, and supplying corrections (and/or appropriate mockery).
(Errors primarily caused by adherence to Aristotelian physics can go in the other thread.)