Round three of Heschmeyer vs. Dillon on abortion:
Friday, 22 May 2015
Wednesday, 20 May 2015
Tuesday, 19 May 2015
Friday, 15 May 2015
Wednesday, 13 May 2015
I don't know whether this is deliberate dishonesty or egregious error: the article has a graph[edit: see below] supposedly showing the "latest" polling data on abortion but which is actually from 2012. This isn't because the whole article is recycled, either, because it is responding to a piece in The New Republic from last month.
Monday, 11 May 2015
Friday, 8 May 2015
Wednesday, 6 May 2015
Tuesday, 5 May 2015
Today's post (or yesterday's by the time I'm done with this):
There's a whole list of things wrong with this article, unsurprisingly. It's a typical religious apologist's view of conversion that prefers anecdote to facts.
Friday, 1 May 2015
Honestly, a question like that could well be raised in, say, a discussion of the Resurrection spell in D&D, in which everyone involved is aware that it's just a game. As with Newland's previous post on resurrection, though, trying to bring it up in what is supposed to be a serious rational discussion is little more than a joke.
Also, the article makes no attempt whatsoever to actually deal with recycling as an objection to the previous article.