Today's post:
How Christians—Not the “Enlightenment”—Launched the Age of Reason
When the gods are shaken from the sky,
there's a scientific reason why.
There's no wish to replace them
and no-one's rushing in to win
the race to fill the empty space
— All About Eve, "Outshine The Sun"
Today's post:
The Most Famous Debate on the Existence of God
I don't know about “most famous”, but this is in relation to a 1948 BBC debate between Bertrand Russell and F. C. Copleston.
This went up yesterday and I missed it:
Strange Notions is the #4 Ranked Atheist Blog on the Internet!
“Feedspot” seems to be a typical feed-reader site that also posts a regular stream of “Top <N> <subject> blogs” articles, all from the same template and quite possibly automatically generated. Their “Top 30 Atheist Blogs” post, which actually contains 32 entries, lists SN at #4 (after Friendly Atheist, r/atheism, and Atheist Revolution); Brandon seems to think that this means something. The meaninglessness of the list, though, is clearly demonstrated by the fact that the #7 entry confuses the blogging network “The Orbit” with Greta Christina's blog which is merely one of the blogs hosted there; #14 is Randal Rauser's blog (even less of an atheist blog than SN is); #16 is “Atheists are Idiots”, a deranged rad-trad Catholic; #18 is “Atheism Analyzed”, another deranged anti-atheist (and evolution denier); and #21 is “Atheistwatch”, one of Joe Hinman's blogs (Joe is resident theist gadfly at the Secular Outpost).
So congratulations, Brandon, you have been given an award by… a purveyor of meaningless awards.
Today's post:
Yesterday's post:
Today's post:
Yesterday's post:
Today's post:
Today's post:
Is the Passage of Time Real or Just an Illusion?
Vogt calls the B-theory of time “controversial”, but according to the Philpapers survey the B-theory is much more popular than the A-theory, especially with philosophers of physical science; A-theoryism is correlated with such positions as Aristotelianism, not being a philosopher of science generally or physical science in particular, being a philosopher of religion, belief in libertarian free will, non-physicalism of minds, non-consequentialism in ethics, and so on.
Yesterday's post:
Yesterday's post:
The Big Problem with Sean Carroll’s “Poetic Naturalism”
This is Vogt's argument against Carroll's idea of “poetic naturalism”. He doesn't do a very good job.
Today's post:
Why Sean Carroll’s “The Big Picture” Is Too Small
Vogt has been promising us his review of Carroll's book for some weeks now, but this is merely an ‘introduction’ to the review; nothing of substance here. The closest Vogt gets to that is the usual knee-jerk criticism of reductionism.
Gosh, a new post; I was starting to forget what those looked like.
Today's post:
Atheists: What Question Would You Ask a Catholic Biblical Scholar?
Vogt says he's after questions from atheists; we should collect some possible questions here if one of the un-banned is willing to forward them...
Today's post:
Today's post:
Skeptic Bart Ehrman on Whether Jesus Really Existed
This isn't even an article, just a posting of (part of?) the introduction to Ehrman's Did Jesus Exist?, widely regarded as his worst book and one that I personally regard as demonstrating an excellent argument for mythicism—or at least for ignoring the academic consensus for historicity.