Today's post:
From Atheism to Catholicism: An Interview with Jennifer Fulwiler (Video)
Haven't watched the video myself. I almost never do in these cases; it takes ten times as long to convey the same amount of information as a transcript or text interview would, and I don't find it a worthwhile use of time.
Today's post is another anti-Ehrman round:
And the theist response to the previous post:
Today's post chooses an obvious theme, given the date:
The Five-Fold Argument for the Resurrection
Drivel from start to end; pretty much summed up by “if we uncritically assume the accuracy of the gospels and Acts, even the bits that textual critics tell us are interpolations (such as the bit about sweating blood), then it's obvious that the resurrection was real”. Duh.
Today's post:
Why Our Unique Solar System Points to God
Summary: junk astrophysics from someone with no apparent qualifications in the subject, whose source is Lee Strobel's garbage (and outdated) apologetics rather than real science.
This is a guest post; the views expressed are those of the contributor, and not of the site owner.
by Fr. Sean
David Hume was one of the most brilliant Scottish philosophers of the 18th century. Among his many works, he wrote a book entitled: An Enquiry into Human Understanding. In chapter ten of the book, he establishes a framework for entertaining the possibility of a miracle. If by chance you aren’t familiar with it, read part 1 and part 2; http://www.bartleby.com/37/3/14.html
Today's post:
Atheism, Philosophy, and Science: An Interview with Dr. Michael Ruse
Not much substance here, though he does reveal that most of the work on the Oxford Handbook of Atheism was actually done by his Catholic co-editor...
