Today's post:
5 Human Desires that Point to God
The old "argument from desire" nonsense again. No, the existence of a desire does not imply the possibility of satisfying it.
When the gods are shaken from the sky,
there's a scientific reason why.
There's no wish to replace them
and no-one's rushing in to win
the race to fill the empty space
— All About Eve, "Outshine The Sun"
Today's post:
5 Human Desires that Point to God
The old "argument from desire" nonsense again. No, the existence of a desire does not imply the possibility of satisfying it.
Today's post:
Is “Heaven” to Blame for Murder?
Horn incorrectly frames an argument (concerning the Janzen murder/suicide case) as being a fallacious appeal to consequences, by conflating the concepts of “X is true” and “belief in X is good”; the first is a fact question, the second a value question.
For bonus points, Horn then proceeds to gratuitously bring in the issue of homosexuality. I find myself very much in favour of this move and think that Catholic apologists should engage in it whenever possible; the more that they harp on it, the more it diminishes their credibility in modern society.
Round three of Heschmeyer vs. Dillon on abortion:
Today's post:
Today's post:
Steven Dillon argues against an argument from Heschmeyer's abortion article using... metaphysics.
Oh dear.
Do You Need God to Know That Abortion is Wrong?
I don't know whether this is deliberate dishonesty or egregious error: the article has a graph[edit: see below] supposedly showing the "latest" polling data on abortion but which is actually from 2012. This isn't because the whole article is recycled, either, because it is responding to a piece in The New Republic from last month.
Today's post:
“The Avengers” and Friedrich Nietzsche
Blah blah Nietzsche blah blah Ubermenschen blah blah Nazis blah blah.
Today's post (or yesterday's by the time I'm done with this):
Why Atheists Change Their Mind: 8 Common Factors
There's a whole list of things wrong with this article, unsurprisingly. It's a typical religious apologist's view of conversion that prefers anecdote to facts.
Today's post:
Can Victims of Cannibals be Raised from the Dead?
Honestly, a question like that could well be raised in, say, a discussion of the Resurrection spell in D&D, in which everyone involved is aware that it's just a game. As with Newland's previous post on resurrection, though, trying to bring it up in what is supposed to be a serious rational discussion is little more than a joke.
Also, the article makes no attempt whatsoever to actually deal with recycling as an objection to the previous article.