A post! Only been two whole weeks since the last one…
The “3:10 to Yuma” Proof of God
In this one, Gordon attempts to top Kreeft's “Argument from Bach” with an “Argument from Western Movies”.
When the gods are shaken from the sky,
there's a scientific reason why.
There's no wish to replace them
and no-one's rushing in to win
the race to fill the empty space
— All About Eve, "Outshine The Sun"
A post! Only been two whole weeks since the last one…
The “3:10 to Yuma” Proof of God
In this one, Gordon attempts to top Kreeft's “Argument from Bach” with an “Argument from Western Movies”.
Gosh, a new post; I was starting to forget what those looked like.
Today's post, in which Robert Barron goes to the movies again:
“Risen” and the Reality of the Resurrection
Nothing to see here.
Today's post:
Doubting Jesus: A Catholic Biblical Scholar Responds to Skeptical Questions
So here we have Pitre's response to a handful of the questions posted a couple of weeks back, and it's... pretty pathetic.
Many of the questions answered are of course from believers, not atheists, and many of the questions chosen are not actually relevant. Pitre is apparently completely committed to the ‘traditional’ authorship of the Gospels, never mind the extensive contradictory evidence, and he presupposes the literal truth of whichever part of whichever Gospel he wants to use to answer any other question. This isn't scholarship, this is pure apologetics.