Today's post:
Bill Nye is Not the Philosophy Guy
Another “oh no! teh scientizmz!” post. As usual, the best rebuttal already exists in the form of Scott Alexander's I Myself Am A Scientismist essay.
When the gods are shaken from the sky,
there's a scientific reason why.
There's no wish to replace them
and no-one's rushing in to win
the race to fill the empty space
— All About Eve, "Outshine The Sun"
Today's post:
Bill Nye is Not the Philosophy Guy
Another “oh no! teh scientizmz!” post. As usual, the best rebuttal already exists in the form of Scott Alexander's I Myself Am A Scientismist essay.
Today's post, in which Robert Barron goes to the movies again:
“Risen” and the Reality of the Resurrection
Nothing to see here.
Today's post:
Barron goes to the movies again:
“The Martian” and Why Each Life Matters
(I haven't seen the movie yet, though it seems to be highly regarded.)
As usual, though, Barron's argument is an almost complete non-sequitur: yes, people set a high value on individual life (often inappropriately), but no, this isn't anything to do with our ability to handle abstractions; quite the reverse in fact.
Today's post:
The Myth of the War Between Science and Religion
Barron has literally nothing to say about the supposed topic of this article; all he can manage is to repeat the vacuous talking points (“look at all these (historical) scientists who were religious!”, “it's no accident that science appeared in Christian Europe!”, etc.) that we've seen before.
Yesterday's post:
Why Your Life Does Not Belong to You
The most obvious issue with this post is that it makes no attempt whatsoever to actually answer the question implied by the title.
Nothing here today except a plug for Barron's theological lesson stuff (with bonus nonsense from Horn). Link omitted because who cares?
Today's post:
Mother Nature is One Unreliable Lady
Now newly endowed with a fancier hat, Barron takes a dim view of nature-worship, rightly agreeing with the statement that nature really doesn't care about humans. But inevitably he takes this in the wrong direction, revealing the deep root of Christian anti-environmentalism: the belief that one can worship a powerful creator-god that does care about humans, that created nature for humans.
Of course not all Christian denominations develop this explicitly into an anti-environmental position; but even those that emphasize ‘stewardship’ theology still, at bottom, retain the dangerous belief that nature is for us, rather than that it simply is the environment that we happen to have evolved in. If we modify the environment beyond our own ability to survive, there will be nobody to blame but ourselves, and more importantly, there will be nobody else to appeal to to fix it.
I will not even dignify this post with a link; it is just another turd in the ongoing baseless smear campaign against Planned Parenthood.
Today's post:
Today's post:
“The Avengers” and Friedrich Nietzsche
Blah blah Nietzsche blah blah Ubermenschen blah blah Nazis blah blah.
Today's post, in which Barron provides a lame non-response to Stephen Fry's recent popular video clip on the subject of God:
Today's post:
Why Having a Heart of Gold is Not What Christianity is About
So apparently Christianity isn't about ethics but rather “the explosive emergence of a new world”. 2000 years on, and the same old world is turning just as it always did. Isn't this argument starting to wear a bit thin?
A subversion of the usual rule about headline questions: Barron thinks the answer is “no”, but he is wrong :-)
Today's post:
Today's post:
Revisiting the Argument from Desire
More attempts to enshrine human cognitive flaws as somehow indicative of the structure of reality.
Today's post:
Today's post:
Today's post:
Today's post probably should be up for some sort of WTFtitle award:
Why It’s Okay to be Against Heresy and for Imposing One’s Will on Others